Kopin Corporation — Earnings Quality Grade F
KOPN · Technology
Major red flags
Screening Summary
管理层信号
数据来源：SEC EDGAR 8-K Item 5.02，附 Exhibit 99.1 链接
Financial Trends
Revenue & Net Income ($B)
Margins (%)
18-Point Screening
Revenue Quality
DSO surged by 16 days (86 → 102)
Small-cap context: DSO swings on a small revenue base are more often quarterly customer-mix effects than red flags.
AR growth -9.5% vs revenue growth -23.6%
Revenue -23.6%, CFFO -9.2%. Cash follows revenue
Expense Quality
Inventory -10.2% vs COGS -23.0%. Normal
CapEx growth 76.3% is >2x revenue growth -23.6%
SG&A/Gross Profit = 153.3%, exceeds 70%
Gross margin 27.6%, change -0.5pp. Stable
Cash Flow Quality
CFFO < Net Income for 3 consecutive years
Small-cap context: Small-cap CFFO/NI often diverges from working-capital swings, not necessarily manipulation.
FCF is negative ($-0.0B)
Accruals ratio = 16.7%. Exceeds 10%
Cash $0.0B covers debt $0.0B
Balance Sheet Health
No goodwill. Clean balance sheet
Debt/EBITDA = -0.1x. Healthy
Other assets 0.0% vs revenue -23.6%. Normal
No write-off data
Acquisition Risk
FCF after acquisitions negative for 3 years
Small-cap context: A single acquisition on a small balance sheet can trip serial-acquirer logic.
No goodwill
Manipulation Score
M-Score = -1.09 (> -1.78). LIKELY MANIPULATOR
Small-cap context: Beneish M-Score was calibrated on large-caps; small-cap DSO/inventory volatility mechanically inflates it.
Beneish M-Score
Altman Z-Score
Generated from public financial data using forensic accounting frameworks. Not investment advice. Data: Yahoo Finance · 2026-04-25