B

Regency Centers (REG) FY2025 Earnings Quality Report

REG·FY2025·English

Grade: B — Generally Healthy, Minor Concerns

Framework: Schilit *Financial Shenanigans* + Beneish M-Score + forensic accounting principles

Data: SEC EDGAR 10-K (Filed 2026-02-13, FY ended December 31, 2025) + Yahoo Finance

Auditor: KPMG LLP — Unqualified opinion

**Note on REIT grading**: Traditional Cash-vs-Debt metrics penalize all REITs because leverage secured by real estate is structural, not distressed. Grade adjusted accordingly.

One-line verdict: Regency Centers is a well-run shopping center REIT with clean books and growing FFO. Nareit FFO rose 8.2% to $855.7 million, AFFO increased 8.8% to $706.6 million, and revenue grew 6.9% to $1.55 billion. The M-Score of -2.50 clears the manipulation threshold comfortably. One watch item: AR outpaced revenue growth for two consecutive years, though DSO remains stable at 49 days. Leverage at 4.6x Debt/EBITDA is slightly elevated but manageable for a retail REIT with a $12+ billion property portfolio. The biggest qualitative risk is tenant concentration in grocery-anchored centers at a time when grocery delivery is reshaping the retail landscape.

MetricResult
Red Flags**0** (AR trend reclassified from fail — DSO stable)
Watch Items**2** (AR trend, leverage 4.6x)
Checks Completed**16/18** (2 N/A: CapEx data, impairment)
Beneish M-Score**-2.50** (clean; threshold is -2.22)
AuditorKPMG LLP — Unqualified opinion

Grocery-Anchored Shopping Centers: The Portfolio

Regency Centers is one of the largest owners, operators, and developers of grocery-anchored shopping centers in the United States. At December 31, 2025, the company owned interests in 482 properties comprising approximately 57.1 million square feet of gross leasable area (GLA).

The investment thesis rests on grocery anchors providing defensive, necessity-based traffic. Per the filing, Regency's properties are anchored by leading grocers and are located in trade areas with above-average population density and household income.

FFO and Operating Performance

MetricFY2023FY2024FY2025Trend
Revenue$1,322M$1,454M$1,554M+6.9% YoY
Net Income$365M$400M$527M+31.8% YoY
Nareit FFO$791M$856M+8.2% YoY
Core Operating Earnings$761M$813M+6.9% YoY
AFFO$649M$707M+8.8% YoY
Gross Margin70.2%70.2%70.6%Stable

Per the filing, Nareit FFO attributable to common stockholders was $855.7 million in FY2025 compared to $790.9 million in FY2024. AFFO of $706.6 million adjusts for operating capital expenditures ($137.3 million), debt cost and derivative adjustments ($9.1 million), and stock-based compensation ($21.6 million).

The reconciliation from Nareit FFO to AFFO deducts $137.3 million in operating capital expenditures — the maintenance CapEx necessary to keep shopping centers competitive. This is real spending that reduces distributable cash flow.

Cash Flow

MetricFY2023FY2024FY2025
Operating Cash Flow$720M$790M$828M
Net Income$365M$400M$527M
CFFO / Net Income1.97x1.97x1.57x
Free Cash Flow$720M$790M$828M
Accruals Ratio-2.3%

CFFO/NI declined from 1.97x to 1.57x — still healthy and reflecting large depreciation add-backs relative to net income. The accruals ratio of -2.3% is clean.

The 18-Point Screening

Revenue Quality

#CheckResultDetail
A1DSO ChangePassDSO 49 days, +1 day YoY — stable
A2AR vs Revenue GrowthWatchAR outpaced revenue for 2 consecutive years
A3Revenue vs CFFOPassRevenue +6.9%, CFFO +4.7%

A2 context: While the engine flagged this as a fail, DSO has been remarkably stable (47.9 to 48.4 to 49.4 days over three years). For a shopping center REIT with quarterly rent collection cycles, this is normal variation. Reclassified to Watch.

Expense Quality

#CheckResultDetail
B1Inventory vs COGSPassNo material inventory
B2CapEx vs RevenueInsufficient data
B3SG&A RatioPassSG&A/Gross Profit = 9.1%, excellent
B4Gross MarginPass70.6%, +0.4pp, stable

Cash Flow Quality

#CheckResultDetail
C1CFFO vs Net IncomePassCFFO/NI = 1.57x
C2Free Cash FlowPassFCF $828M, FCF/NI = 1.57x
C3Accruals RatioPass-2.3%, low accruals
C4Cash vs Debt**REIT Context**Cash $105M vs debt $5.3B — structural REIT leverage

Balance Sheet

#CheckResultDetail
D1Goodwill + IntangiblesPass$421M = 6% of equity
D2LeverageWatchDebt/EBITDA = 4.6x, interest coverage 2.8x
D3Soft Asset GrowthPassOther assets -14.1% vs revenue +6.9%
D4Asset ImpairmentNo write-off data

D2: Debt/EBITDA of 4.6x is slightly above the 4x threshold. Interest coverage of 2.8x provides adequate but not generous debt service capacity. For a retail REIT with predictable lease income, this is manageable but warrants monitoring.

Acquisition Risk

#CheckResultDetail
E1Serial Acquirer FCFPassFCF after acquisitions positive
E2Goodwill SurgePassGoodwill+Intangibles +6% YoY

Manipulation Score

#CheckResultDetail
F1Beneish M-ScorePass-2.50, unlikely manipulator

M-Score components are all benign: DSRI 1.021, GMI 0.995, AQI 0.996, SGI 1.069, DEPI 0.984, SGAI 0.917, TATA -0.023.

Key Risks from the 10-K

1. Tenant Concentration and Grocery Evolution

Regency's entire thesis depends on grocery anchors driving foot traffic. The 10-K acknowledges competition from "other retail properties, internet-based businesses, and other channels of distribution." As grocery delivery penetration grows, the traffic-driving power of physical grocery anchors may diminish over time.

2. Straight-Line Rent Adjustments

The Core Operating Earnings reconciliation deducts $27.3 million in straight-line rent (compared to $23.0 million in 2024). Straight-line rent recognizes the average rent over a lease term in each period, rather than actual cash received. This creates a gap between GAAP revenue and cash revenue that grows as new leases with escalators are signed.

3. Acquisition Activity and Debt Growth

Total debt increased from $4.8 billion (FY2023) to $5.3 billion (FY2025) — a 12% increase over two years. The filing discloses acquisition activity through unconsolidated investment partnerships, with the company's share of partnership net income of $133.5 million. Off-balance-sheet exposure through joint ventures adds leverage that the consolidated balance sheet understates.

4. Merger Transition Costs

The FY2025 Core Operating Earnings reconciliation includes $7.7 million in "merger transition costs" — these are one-time items that do not appear in FY2024, suggesting integration activity from a recent or pending transaction. This warrants monitoring for further charges.

Summary

Grade: B. Clean books, growing FFO, moderate leverage.

Regency Centers demonstrates solid earnings quality across the screening framework. Nareit FFO grew 8.2%, AFFO grew 8.8%, and the M-Score of -2.50 shows no manipulation signals. The only quantitative concern is leverage at 4.6x Debt/EBITDA — slightly elevated but acceptable for a grocery-anchored REIT with predictable cash flows. DSO is stable at 49 days despite the AR-vs-revenue flag. The accruals ratio is clean at -2.3%, and SG&A discipline is excellent at 9.1% of gross profit.

The qualitative risks center on the long-term viability of the grocery-anchored shopping center model and the company's growing debt load from acquisition activity. Neither rises to the level of a red flag.

**Disclaimer**: This report is based on Regency Centers' FY2025 10-K filed with SEC EDGAR on February 13, 2026. This is NOT investment advice.

Data: SEC EDGAR 10-K + Yahoo Finance

Auditor: KPMG LLP (Unqualified opinion)

Fiscal year ended: December 31, 2025

This report is based on SEC 10-K filings and public financial data. Not investment advice.

Regency Centers (REG) FY2025 Earnings Quality Report — EarningsGrade