F

J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT) FY2025 Earnings Quality Report

JBHT·FY2025·English

Grade: F — Major Red Flags

Framework: Schilit *Financial Shenanigans* + Beneish M-Score + forensic accounting principles

Data: SEC EDGAR 10-K (Filed February 24, 2026, FY ended December 31, 2025) + Yahoo Finance

Auditor: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP — Unqualified opinion (1 critical audit matter: personal injury and property damage claims accruals)

One-line verdict: J.B. Hunt has a near-empty cash drawer. At December 31, 2025 the company held $17 million in cash against $1.47 billion in total debt — cash covers just 1% of debt. The F grade is driven entirely by this liquidity composition. Everything else looks clean: revenue of $12.00 billion was essentially flat (-0.7%), operating cash flow rose to $1.68 billion, FCF climbed to $948 million, and the M-Score of -3.19 is comfortably below the manipulation threshold. Debt/EBITDA is only 0.9x and goodwill plus intangibles are a trivial 6% of equity. The filing itself flags the immediate refinancing task: "For our senior notes maturing in 2026, it is our intent to pay the entire outstanding balances in full, on or before the maturity dates, using our existing cash balance, revolving line of credit or other sources of long-term financing." The $700 million of 3.875% notes coming due March 2026 is the single biggest reason cash looks so thin — management is holding borrowing capacity, not cash.

MetricResult
Red Flags**1** (C4 cash-to-debt)
Watch Items**0**
Checks Completed**17/18**
Beneish M-Score**-3.19** (clean)
Altman Z-Score**4.53** (safe)

A Freight Business Navigating Its Fourth Consecutive Down Year

From Item 1 (Business), J.B. Hunt is "one of the largest surface transportation, delivery, and logistics companies in North America," operating five segments: Intermodal (JBI), Dedicated Contract Services (DCS), Integrated Capacity Solutions (ICS), Final Mile Services (FMS) and Truckload (JBT). At December 31, 2025, the company had 31,750 employees, 18,843 company-owned tractors and trucks, and over 190,000 pieces of transportation equipment.

The MD&A describes 2025 as another year of modest erosion in a multi-year freight downturn. Consolidated operating revenue was $12.00 billion, down 0.7% from $12.09 billion in 2024. Looking back further: revenue has fallen from $14.81 billion (2022) to $12.83 billion (2023) to $12.09 billion (2024) to $12.00 billion (2025) — a cumulative 19% decline over three years. Operating income in 2025 was $865 million versus $831 million in 2024, a 4.1% increase that reflects cost discipline rather than growth.

Financial Performance: Flat Top Line, Marginal Profit Recovery

From the MD&A results-of-operations table and segment disclosures:

MetricFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Operating Revenue$12,000M$12,087M$12,830M$14,810M
Gross Profit$1,597M$1,568M$1,707M$1,969M
Gross Margin13.3%13.0%13.3%13.3%
Operating Income$865M$831M$950M$1,320M
Operating Ratio92.8%93.1%92.6%91.1%
Net Earnings$598M$571M$728M$970M
Effective Tax Rate24.7%24.8%

Per the MD&A: the 0.7% revenue decline was "primarily due to decreased revenue per load within JBI and JBT, lower volume within ICS, reduced truck count in DCS, and decreased revenue and stop counts in FMS, partially offset by higher volume in JBI and JBT, higher revenue per load in ICS, and increased productivity in DCS." Fuel surcharge revenues fell 3.5% to $1.48 billion from $1.53 billion.

Segment detail: JBI (the largest segment) was "relatively flat" at $5.98 billion versus $5.96 billion — load volume up 2%, revenue per load down 2%. DCS declined 1% to $3.38 billion. ICS was down 3% to $1.11 billion. FMS dropped 10% to $824 million "due to general weakness in customer demand, loss of business due to internal efforts to improve revenue quality across certain accounts, and customer mix." JBT rose 5% to $734 million.

Operating cost dynamics (as percentage of revenue, from MD&A): Rents and purchased transportation were 44.2% (down from 44.5%) — "the majority of our total costs" per management. Salaries, wages and benefits held at 27.0%. Depreciation and amortization fell 6.1%, which the MD&A explicitly attributes to "an increase in the expected useful lives of our chassis and trailer fleets, the absence in 2025 of depreciation and amortization expense related to the 2023 business acquisition of BNSF Logistics, LLC (BNSFL), and the reduction in DCS truck counts." The useful-life extension is a legitimate accounting change but worth noting — it reduced expenses without improving the underlying business. Insurance and claims rose 6.7% "primarily due to an increase in cost per claim, higher insurance policy premium expense."

Cash Flow: Strong Conversion, Weak Liquidity

MetricFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Operating Cash Flow$1,678M$1,482M$1,743M$1,777M
Net Income$598M$571M$728M$970M
**CFFO / Net Income****2.81****2.60****2.39****1.83**
CapEx$731M$862M$1,864M$1,539M
Free Cash Flow$948M$619M-$121M$238M

Per the MD&A: "Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $1.68 billion in 2025, compared to $1.48 billion in 2024. The increase was primarily due to increased earnings and the timing of general working capital activities. Net cash used in investing activities totaled $575 million in 2025, compared with $664 million in 2024. The decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in equipment purchases, net of proceeds from the sale of equipment."

CFFO/NI of 2.81 is high because depreciation is a very large non-cash expense for a trucking/intermodal company — each year $720M+ of revenue equipment wears down without cash leaving the business. Free cash flow has swung dramatically with the CapEx cycle: FY2023 saw $1.86 billion of CapEx and negative FCF; FY2025's $731M of CapEx produced the strongest FCF in four years.

Financing activities drained the cash position. Per the MD&A: "Net cash used in financing activities was $1.1 billion in 2025, compared with $826 million in 2024. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in current year treasury stock purchases." Share buybacks, not operating losses, emptied the drawer. Shares outstanding fell from 100.6 million to 94.6 million — a 6% reduction.

Balance Sheet: The $17 Million Cash Position

ItemFY2025
Cash$17M
Total Debt$1,467M
Current Maturities LT Debt(Includes $700M due March 2026)
Long-term DebtSenior notes: $700M 3.875% due 2026, $750M 4.90% due 2030
Stockholders' Equity(ROE 16.8%)
Goodwill + Intangibles$244M (6% of equity)

The MD&A describes the revolving facility: "At December 31, 2025, we were authorized to borrow up to $1.7 billion through a revolving line of credit and committed term loans... The revolving line of credit authorizes us to borrow up to $1.0 billion under a five-year term expiring November 2030, and allows us to request an increase in the revolving line of credit total commitment by up to $400 million... The committed term loans authorize us to borrow up to an additional $700 million during the six-month period beginning November 25, 2025."

So while cash is $17M, the company has $1.0B undrawn on the revolver plus $700M of committed term-loan capacity. Per the filing: "Under our senior credit facility, we had a $26.8 million outstanding balance on the revolving line of credit, at an average interest rate of 4.62%." The liquidity structure is intentional: management is holding revolving capacity rather than cash because parking cash earning Fed Funds while paying 4.62% on drawn debt is negative-carry.

Debt/EBITDA of 0.9x is healthy. Interest coverage is strong — net interest expense is approximately $72M against $865M operating income, a 12x coverage ratio. The filing states: "At December 31, 2025, we were in compliance with all covenants and financial ratios."

The $700M senior notes due March 2026 are the binding constraint. Management intends to "pay the entire outstanding balances in full, on or before the maturity dates, using our existing cash balance, revolving line of credit or other sources of long-term financing." In an environment of elevated refinancing rates, rolling 3.875% debt into something closer to 5% will raise interest expense by roughly $8M per year — manageable but real.

The 18-Point Screening

Revenue Quality

#CheckResultDetail
A1DSO ChangePASSDSO 35 days, -2 days YoY
A2AR vs Revenue GrowthPASSAR -5.2% vs revenue -0.7%
A3Revenue vs CFFOPASSRevenue -0.7%, CFFO +13.2%. Cash follows revenue

Revenue quality is pristine. AR declined faster than revenue and DSO improved — the opposite of every manipulation pattern.

Expense Quality

#CheckResultDetail
B1Inventory vs COGSPASSInventory +1.3% vs COGS -1.1%
B2CapEx vs RevenuePASSCapEx -15.6% vs revenue -0.7%
B3SG&A RatioPASSSG&A/Gross Profit = 41.3%
B4Gross MarginPASS13.3%, +0.3pp. Stable

Gross margin of 13.3% is low in absolute terms (trucking/intermodal is a thin-margin business) but stable across all four years in the trend table.

Cash Flow Quality

#CheckResultDetail
C1CFFO vs Net IncomePASSCFFO/NI = 2.81
C2Free Cash FlowPASSFCF $948M, FCF/NI = 1.58
C3Accruals RatioPASS-13.6%, low accruals
C4Cash vs Debt**FAIL**Cash $17M covers only 1% of debt $1,467M

Balance Sheet

#CheckResultDetail
D1Goodwill + IntangiblesPASS$0.2B = 6% of equity
D2LeveragePASSDebt/EBITDA = 0.9x
D3Soft Asset GrowthPASSOther assets -1.0% vs revenue -0.7%
D4Asset ImpairmentN/ANo write-off data

Acquisition Risk

#CheckResultDetail
E1Serial Acquirer FCFPASSFCF after acquisitions positive
E2Goodwill SurgePASSGoodwill+Intangibles -9% YoY

Manipulation Score

#CheckResultDetail
F1Beneish M-ScorePASS-3.19 (threshold: < -2.22)

M-Score components are all benign: DSRI 0.955, GMI 0.975, AQI 1.014, SGI 0.993, DEPI 1.026, SGAI 1.001, TATA -0.136, LVGI 1.067. The negative TATA (-0.136) is noteworthy — it indicates accruals are strongly negative, which means cash flow is substantially above earnings. This is the opposite of manipulation; it is a signal of conservative accounting.

Key Risks from the 10-K

1. Cyclical Freight Demand Exposure

The risk factors lead with: "Our business can be significantly impacted by economic conditions, customer business cycles, government policies, and seasonal factors. Our business is dependent on the freight shipping needs of our customers, which can be heavily impacted by economic conditions and other factors affecting their businesses. Recessionary economic cycles and downturns in customers business cycles... may substantially reduce freight volumes for which our customers need transportation services and lead to excess capacity in the industry and resulting pressure on the rates we are able to obtain for our services." The MD&A backs this up: revenue has fallen from $14.81B to $12.00B over three years — a 19% decline driven by exactly the dynamic described in the risk factor.

2. Trade Policy and Tariff Exposure

The risk factors explicitly call out policy risk: "Rapid changes in government or political policies, including border or trade policies and tariffs, can also impact our customers operations and reduce their need for freight shipping, or may have an impact on the cost or availability of our equipment." JBHT is an intermodal and trucking pure-play — a material slowdown in US import volumes hits it directly through the JBI and ICS segments.

3. Customer Concentration

Per Item 1A: "For the calendar year ended December 31, 2025, our top 10 customers, based on revenue, accounted for approximately 33% of our revenue. Our JBI, ICS, and JBT segments typically do not have long-term contracts with their customers." This is concentrated exposure, and the filing notes long-term contracts in DCS and FMS "may contain cancellation clauses."

4. Insurance and Auto Liability Inflation

The risk factors warn: "We have experienced substantial increases in the cost of auto liability claims and in recent periods these increases have exceeded our insurance coverage layers, which has adversely impacted our operating results." The critical audit matter identified by PwC is precisely this — personal injury and property damage claims accruals, with current and long-term accruals totaling $727 million ($283M current + $444M long-term). The MD&A confirms: "Insurance and claims expense increased 6.7% in 2025, primarily due to an increase in cost per claim, higher insurance policy premium expense." This is an industry-wide "nuclear verdict" phenomenon and shows up directly in the income statement.

5. Railroad Dependence

The filing states: "Our JBI business segment utilizes railroads in the performance of its transportation services. The majority of these services are provided pursuant to contractual relationships with the railroads. While we have agreements with a number of Class I railroads, the majority of our business travels on the BNSF and the Norfolk Southern railways." Because JBI is the largest segment ($5.98B), disruption at BNSF or Norfolk Southern — whether labor, service levels, or contract renegotiation — directly hits the business.

6. Rapid Evolution of AI and Technology

A new-for-2025 risk factor addresses AI: "The rapid evolution and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and any efforts we may make to incorporate it into our business may amplify cyber, legal, and operational risks. AI adoption may introduce or amplify risks, including inaccurate or biased outputs that are difficult to detect, governance and model-risk challenges, privacy and intellectual property concerns, and evolving legal disclosure obligations." J.B. Hunt 360, the company's digital freight platform, generated $349M in ICS revenue in 2025 (down from $395.8M) — the platform is a strategic asset but also a competitive vector where better-funded tech entrants could erode margins.

7. Refinancing Concentration in 2026

The binding near-term risk is the $700M senior note maturity in March 2026. The filing explicitly states management will use "our existing cash balance, revolving line of credit or other sources of long-term financing" to retire the notes. This is the operational reason for the $17M cash position.

Summary

Grade: F. This is a grade driven by a single critical-check failure (C4: cash-to-debt) that reflects a treasury choice, not distress.

Every other indicator tells a healthy story. M-Score is -3.19, Z-Score is 4.53, Debt/EBITDA is 0.9x, CFFO/NI is 2.81, goodwill is trivial, and the accruals ratio of -13.6% points to conservative (not aggressive) accounting. PwC's critical audit matter — personal injury claims accruals at $727 million combined — is a business hazard common to all trucking companies, not an accounting red flag. Revenue quality, expense quality, and balance sheet leverage all pass.

The stress point is the $700M senior note due March 2026 and management's decision to run a $17M cash balance while holding $1 billion of undrawn revolver capacity. This is a treasury-management choice: why pay 4.62% on drawn debt while cash earns less than that? The risk is execution — if credit markets seize or the revolver becomes unavailable, the company would scramble. In normal credit conditions, this is a zero-issue refinancing.

The deeper concern isn't the balance sheet — it's the top line. Revenue has fallen from $14.81B (2022) to $12.00B (2025), a 19% decline that matches a multi-year freight recession. The MD&A explains the 2025 softness as "decreased revenue per load within JBI and JBT, lower volume within ICS, reduced truck count in DCS." FMS revenue dropped 10%. A rebound in freight volumes is needed for operating leverage to work in management's favor. Until then, the company is holding margins through cost discipline rather than growing.

**Disclaimer**: This report is based on J.B. Hunt Transport Services' FY2025 10-K filed with SEC EDGAR. This is NOT investment advice.

Data: SEC EDGAR 10-K + Yahoo Finance

Auditor: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Unqualified opinion, 1 critical audit matter — personal injury and property damage claims accruals)

Fiscal year ended: December 31, 2025

This report is based on SEC 10-K filings and public financial data. Not investment advice.

J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT) FY2025 Earnings Quality Report — EarningsGrade