Grade: C — Some Red Flags, Investigate
Framework: Schilit *Financial Shenanigans* + Beneish M-Score + forensic accounting principles
Data: SEC EDGAR 10-K (Filed 2026-02-17) + Yahoo Finance
Auditor: Ernst & Young LLP — Clean opinion (1 critical audit matter: revenue recognition)
One-line verdict: Palantir should not be flagged for elimination, but the C grade flags legitimate concerns behind the explosive growth. Revenue surged 56% to $4.5B, income from operations hit $1.4B, and free cash flow reached $2.1B — on paper, a spectacular year. But look closer: accounts receivable outpaced revenue for two consecutive years (the only fail), DSO climbed from 60 to 85 days, stock-based compensation was $684M (42% of net income), and the M-Score sits in the grey zone at -1.89. The auditor flagged revenue recognition as the sole critical audit matter due to the complexity of non-standard contract terms. This is a company where the gap between GAAP and adjusted metrics is enormous, and the AR trajectory demands monitoring.
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Red Flags | **1** (AR outpaced revenue 2 consecutive years) |
| Watch Items | **3** (DSO increase, CapEx growth, M-Score grey zone) |
| Checks Completed | **17/18** |
| Beneish M-Score | **-1.89** (grey zone) |
| Auditor | Ernst & Young — Unqualified opinion |
The AI Defense Platform at Hypergrowth
Palantir builds software for government intelligence agencies and commercial enterprises. The company operates four platforms: Gotham (defense/intelligence), Foundry (enterprise data operations), Apollo (continuous delivery), and AIP (generative AI). The AI narrative has supercharged growth — AIP, launched in 2023, is described in the 10-K as "designed for customers across the commercial and government sectors, enabling them to derive value from recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence via the combination of our existing software platforms with generative AI models, including LLMs."
| Metric | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.2B | $2.9B | $4.5B | +56% |
| Gross Profit | $1.5B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $3.7B | +60% |
| Gross Margin | 78.6% | 80.6% | 80.2% | 82.4% | +2.1pp |
| Income from Ops (GAAP) | — | $0.1B | $0.3B | $1.4B | +4.5x |
| Net Income | $(0.4B) | $0.2B | $0.5B | $1.6B | +252% |
| Net Margin | -19.6% | 9.4% | 16.1% | 36.3% | +20.2pp |
| ROE | -14.6% | 6.0% | 9.2% | 22.0% | Rising |
From the 10-K: "In the year ended December 31, 2025, we generated income from operations of $1.4 billion, or adjusted income from operations of $2.3 billion when excluding stock-based compensation and related employer payroll taxes." The $0.9B gap between GAAP and adjusted income is the SBC problem we'll discuss below.
Revenue by Segment
| Segment | FY2025 | FY2024 | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government | $2.4B | $1.6B | +53% |
| Commercial | $2.1B | $1.3B | +60% |
| **Total** | **$4.5B** | **$2.9B** | **+56%** |
From the 10-K: "Revenue from government customers increased by $832.7 million, or 53%... Of the increase, $774.0 million was from government customers existing as of December 31, 2024." This means 93% of government revenue growth came from expanding existing relationships, not new logos. Similarly, Commercial grew 60%, driven heavily by AIP adoption.
The customer count grew from 711 to 954 (34% growth), but top-20 customer average revenue grew 45% to $93.9M — classic "land and expand" pattern.
The Stock-Based Compensation Problem
This is the elephant in the room. From the 10-K:
| SBC Breakdown | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost of revenue | $65M | $69M | $36M |
| Sales & marketing | $249M | $239M | $161M |
| R&D | $137M | $165M | $98M |
| G&A | $234M | $218M | $181M |
| **Total SBC** | **$684M** | **$692M** | **$476M** |
SBC of $684M represents 42% of net income ($1.6B) and 15.3% of revenue ($4.5B). GAAP gross margin is 82%, but excluding SBC it's 84%. GAAP operating income is $1.4B, but adjusted (ex-SBC) it's $2.3B.
The saving grace: SBC declined slightly in absolute dollars ($692M to $684M) while revenue grew 56%. SBC as a percentage of revenue dropped from 24% to 15% — the dilution is decreasing on a relative basis. Total diluted share count grew from 2.45B to 2.57B (5% dilution). The 10-K also shows $75M in stock repurchases in FY2025, a new development — Palantir is beginning to offset dilution.
Cash Flow: Genuinely Strong
| Metric | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $224M | $712M | $1.15B | $2.13B |
| CapEx | $(40M) | $(15M) | $(13M) | $(34M) |
| Free Cash Flow | $184M | $697M | $1.14B | $2.10B |
| CFFO / Net Income | -0.60 | 3.39 | 2.50 | 1.31 |
Free cash flow of $2.1B on $1.6B net income — a CFFO/NI ratio of 1.31 — confirms that profits are backed by cash. The declining ratio (from 3.39 in FY2023 to 1.31 in FY2025) actually reflects improving earnings quality: as net income catches up to cash flow, the ratio normalizes. CapEx is trivially small ($34M) for a software company — no factories, no inventory, minimal physical infrastructure.
Balance Sheet: Fortress
| Item | FY2025 | FY2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Cash & equivalents | $7.2B | $5.2B |
| Marketable securities | $5.8B | $3.1B |
| **Total liquid assets** | **$13.0B** | **$8.3B** |
| Total debt | $229M | $239M |
| Total equity | $7.5B | $5.1B |
| Accumulated deficit | $(3.6B) | $(5.2B) |
Palantir has $7.2B in cash and $5.8B in marketable securities against only $229M in debt. This is a fortress balance sheet — the company could pay off all debt 57 times over. The accumulated deficit of $3.6B (down from $5.2B) reflects the company's historical losses from its first two decades of operations; it is being rapidly erased by current profitability.
Zero goodwill. Zero intangible assets on the balance sheet. This is a clean, asset-light software company.
From the 10-K, remaining performance obligations were "$4.1 billion as of December 31, 2025, of which the Company expects to recognize approximately 38% as revenue over the next 12 months, 36% as revenue over the" following year. That's $1.6B in locked-in near-term revenue.
The 18-Point Screening
Revenue Quality
| # | Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | DSO | Watch | DSO increased 12 days (73 to 85 days) |
| A2 | AR vs Revenue | Fail | AR outpaced revenue for 2 consecutive years |
| A3 | Revenue vs CFFO | Pass | Revenue +56%, CFFO +85%. Cash leads |
A2: This is the screening's only fail and it's significant. AR grew from $575M to $1.04B — an 81% increase vs 56% revenue growth. And this happened the prior year too. DSO rose from 60 days (FY2023) to 73 days (FY2024) to 85 days (FY2025).
Why? The 10-K provides context: Palantir's sales cycle is "long and unpredictable," and government contracts involve complex billing terms. The company expanded from 711 to 954 customers, with many new government contracts that have different payment schedules. The 10-K warns: "The timing of our customer billings and receipt of payments varies from contract to contract." Rising DSO in a hypergrowth software company is common — but two consecutive years of AR outpacing revenue is a flag that cannot be dismissed.
A3 provides the counter-argument: CFFO grew 85% on 56% revenue growth. Cash is coming in — it's just taking longer to collect.
Expense Quality
| # | Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Inventory | Pass | No inventory — software company |
| B2 | CapEx | Watch | CapEx growth 168% is >2x revenue growth 56% |
| B3 | SG&A Ratio | Pass | SG&A/Gross Profit = 46.5%. Normal for enterprise software |
| B4 | Gross Margin | Pass | 82.4%, +2.1pp. Expanding |
B2: CapEx grew from $13M to $34M. In absolute terms this is trivial for a $4.5B revenue company, but the 168% growth rate triggers the screening flag. The number is so small ($34M) that a single property lease or infrastructure investment can cause wild percentage swings — this is a false positive.
Cash Flow Quality
| # | Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | CFFO vs NI | Pass | Ratio 1.31. Strong cash conversion |
| C2 | FCF | Pass | $2.1B, FCF/NI = 1.29 |
| C3 | Accruals | Pass | -5.7% accruals ratio. Negative accruals = high quality |
| C4 | Cash vs Debt | Pass | Cash $7.2B covers debt $229M — 31x over |
All four cash flow checks pass. Negative accruals ratio (-5.7%) means cash flow exceeds accounting earnings — a hallmark of genuine profitability.
Balance Sheet
| # | Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Goodwill + Intangibles | Pass | Zero goodwill. Clean |
| D2 | Leverage | Pass | Debt/EBITDA = 0.2x. Near-zero leverage |
| D3 | Soft Asset Growth | Pass | Other assets +75% vs revenue +56%. Normal |
| D4 | Impairment | N/A | No write-off data |
No goodwill, near-zero debt, minimal leverage. The balance sheet is pristine.
M&A Risk
| # | Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Post-Acquisition FCF | Pass | FCF after acquisitions positive |
| E2 | Goodwill Surge | Pass | No goodwill |
Beneish M-Score
| # | Check | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | M-Score | Watch | -1.89 (grey zone) |
The M-Score of -1.89 sits in the grey zone (-2.22 to -1.78). Key drivers: DSRI of 1.16 (receivables growing faster than revenue), AQI of 1.244 (asset quality declining — driven by the buildup of marketable securities), SGI of 1.562 (high sales growth), and DEPI of 1.236 (depreciation index). No single component is alarming, but the aggregate pushes the score into grey territory. This is characteristic of hypergrowth companies — the M-Score was designed for mature businesses, and fast-growing software companies frequently land in the grey zone without actual manipulation.
Key Risks from Item 1A
1. Customer concentration. The 10-K warns: "a limited number of customers account for a substantial portion of our revenue." Top-20 customers averaged $93.9M in revenue — if a few large government contracts don't renew, the impact would be material.
2. Long and unpredictable sales cycles. "Our sales efforts involve considerable time and expense, and our sales cycle is often long and unpredictable." Palantir often provides free pilots and bootcamps, with "no guarantee that we will be able to convert customers from these short-term pilot deployments to longer-term revenue-generating contracts."
3. Government budget dependency. A significant portion of revenue comes from U.S. government agencies. The 10-K warns about "decline in the U.S. and other government budgets, changes in spending or budgetary priorities, or delays in contract awards."
4. Founder voting control. The 10-K explicitly states risk from "the multi-class structure of our common stock, the Founder Voting Trust Agreement, and the Founder Voting Agreement [which] concentrate voting power with certain stockholders, in particular, Stephen Cohen, Alexander Karp, and Peter Thiel."
5. Revenue recognition complexity. EY flagged this as the critical audit matter: "Management applies significant judgment in identifying and evaluating any non-standard terms and conditions in customer arrangements which may impact the determination of performance obligations or the timing of revenue recognition."
Altman Z-Score and F-Score
| Model | Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Altman Z-Score | **10.55** | Safe zone (>2.99). Extremely strong |
| F-Score (Dechow) | **1.02** | Low fraud probability (0.38%) |
The Z-Score of 10.55 is exceptional — driven by massive cash holdings relative to minimal debt and a high equity-to-liabilities ratio (5.23x). Zero bankruptcy risk.
Summary
| # | Check | Result |
|---|---|---|
| A1-A3 | Revenue Quality | Watch-Fail-Pass |
| B1-B4 | Expense Quality | Pass-Watch-Pass-Pass |
| C1-C4 | Cash Flow Quality | Pass-Pass-Pass-Pass |
| D1-D4 | Balance Sheet | Pass-Pass-Pass-N/A |
| E1-E2 | M&A Risk | Pass-Pass |
| F1 | Beneish M-Score | Watch |
Grade: C. Should not be flagged for elimination, but the AR trend and SBC dilution require ongoing monitoring.
Palantir's underlying business is strong and accelerating. Revenue grew 56%, free cash flow doubled, gross margins expanded, and the balance sheet is a fortress with $13B in liquid assets against $229M in debt. The company is clearly benefiting from the AI wave, with AIP driving adoption across government and commercial segments.
But the C grade is earned:
The saving grace: cash doesn't lie. CFFO of $2.1B exceeds net income, FCF is positive and growing, accruals are negative, and there's zero goodwill to write down. If the AR issue were a real earnings quality problem, you would expect cash flow to diverge from earnings — the opposite is happening.
**Disclaimer**: This report is based on Palantir's FY2025 10-K (SEC EDGAR) and public financial data. This is NOT investment advice.
Data: SEC EDGAR 10-K (Filed 2026-02-17) + Yahoo Finance
Auditor: Ernst & Young LLP (Unqualified opinion, 1 critical audit matter)
